东北三省精准教学2024年9月高三联考英语试题

东北三省精准教学2024年9月高三联考英语试题正在持续更新，目前2025衡水金卷先享题答案网为大家整理了相关试题及答案，供大家查缺补漏，高效提升成绩。

本文从以下几个角度介绍。

1、东北三省2024年高三第三次联合模拟考试英语
2、2024年东北三省四市教研联合体高考模拟试卷(二)英语
3、2024东北三省三校高三第二次模拟英语
4、2023-2024东北三省重点中学高三10月联合考试英语
5、2024东北三省四市联考英语
6、2024年东北三省四市教研联合体高考模拟试卷英语
7、东北三省三校2024年高三第一次联合模拟考试英语
8、2024东北三省四市教研联合体高考模拟试卷英语
9、2024年东北三省四市教研联合体高考模拟试卷一英语
10、2024年东北三省四市教研联合体高考模拟试卷二英语

0There have been concerns that video games might damage our mental and physical well-being.Recently,more researches have revealed these worries are largely unfounded.Nevertheless,thereexists a deep-seated idea that playing them rots your brain-it's easy to view them as an unproductivewaste of time.But in reality,is the opposite the case?For years,"brain-training"games and apps have been convinced to be an effective way to boost ourcognitive()abilities or intelligence,as it's thought that by playing a series of quickfire puzzlesfocusing on things like memory or spatial awareness,over time our abilities in these areas will improve;theoretically,so will our general intelligence.From a research viewpoint,the key lies in whether playing these sorts of games results in“transfer'”effects-“near”and“far”transfer effects:near effects relate to whether playing one memorygame results in improvements in other memory games,whereas far effects relate to whether playingthat game results in a general improvement in cognitive abilities.Some studies have pointed out brain-training games show weak near effects.As for far effects,there's no convincing evidence this happens.However,things get interesting when brain-training games are compared with video games.In a2015 study comparing the brain-training game SmartP with the video game Mazix,researchers foundSmartP players didn't show boosts in problem-solving and spatial skills,but Mazix players did.More recently,in 2020,researchers in Sweden studied data from some 9,000 children and foundthat kids aged 9 or 10 who played video games for'above-average amounts of time didn't show anydifferences in intelligence compared with those playing less.Two years later,they discovered that by12,the kids playing video games had 2.5 more IQ points than average.Why video games result in improvements in cognitive abilities over more targeted games isn'tclear.One argument is to do with the amount of time invested:whereas brain-training apps tend todeliver mini-games over a short time,video games have players engaged and require sustained levels ofattention and problem-solving.Despite some promising findings,it's currently unsafe to say that videogames make us smarter.Meanwhile,video games can offer both advantages and risks,so it's importantto be cautious and avoid making quick judgments.32.What do people usually think of brain-training games?A.They are a waste of time.B.They can improve our intelligence.C.They are easily accessible.D.They may enhance our concentration.33.What do we know about Mazix players?A.They demonstrated signs of far effects.B.They had a great talent for video gamesC.They exhibited boosts in gaming skills.D.They proved the importance of near effects.34.What does the study in 2020 reveal?A.The limited effects of age on IQ points.B.The negative impacts of video games.C.The advantages of playing more games.D.The benefits of video games over time.35.What is the best title for the text?A.Do Brain-training Games Really Work?B.Video Games or Brain-training Games?C.Could Video Games Make Us Smarter?D.Should We Stop Playing Video Games?英语试卷第6页（共10页）